“Taking this a step further, we think that an Internet media company (using just one example) can (and should) be structured not as AOL and Yahoo were or are, but instead as a loose collection of similarly related businesses (similar in philosophy of how you interact with users, how you build your service, how you view data, how you view inter-relating with other businesses), that work together - cross pollinate - in a number of different but flexible and fluid ways. ”—
It implies a level of uniform ownership that I don’t think you actually mean.
No, I actually mean a completely non-uniform level of ownership in things.
Rafer sez:
@AWeissman I’m not sure that calling it a “media company” works here. It implies a level of uniform ownership that I don’t think you actually mean.
(via rafer)
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam euismod molestie elementum. Aenean ut quam vel neque mattis ultricies et congue ante. Curabitur semper mattis eleifend. Nunc vitae mauris leo. Maecenas non nisl iaculis magna fringilla condimentum. Sed ac dui non ipsum sodales fringilla. Donec aliquam, odio quis placerat facilisis, lacus est commodo elit, in pharetra lorem tortor et justo.
